Spread the news

Dylann Roof is escorted into the court room at the Charleston County Judicial Center to enter his guilty plea on murder charges in state court in Charleston, South Carolina April 10, 2017. — Reuters pic
Dylann Roof is escorted into the court room at the Charleston County Judicial Center to enter his guilty plea on murder charges in state court in Charleston, South Carolina April 10, 2017. — Reuters pic

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our Telegram channel for the latest updates.


WASHINGTON, Aug 26 ― A US court of appeals yesterday upheld the death sentence of Dylann Roof, the white shooter convicted of killing nine Black worshipers at a South Carolina church in 2015.

Armed with a .45-calibre pistol, Roof fired 77 rounds in his shooting spree at the historic Mother Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston on June 17, 2015.

Roof, who was 21 at the time, “murdered African Americans at their church, during their Bible-study and worship. They had welcomed him. He slaughtered them,” read the court’s ruling in part.

“He did so with the express intent of terrorising not just his immediate victims… but as many similar people as would hear of the mass murder.”

Roof, now 27, is not at risk of execution in the short term as President Joe Biden’s administration has imposed a moratorium on federal executions.

As stated in a racist manifesto, Roof’s goal was “to foment racial division and strife” across the country.

“No cold record or careful parsing of statutes and precedents can capture the full horror of what Roof did. His crimes qualify him for the harshest penalty that a just society can impose,” the ruling read.

The Mother Emmanuel AME Church massacre “is one of the worst events in not only South Carolina’s history but also our nation’s history,” said Nathan Williams, one of the lead prosecutors on the case at the US attorney’s office in South Carolina.

Roof was sentenced in early 2017 without having expressed regret or apologies.

His lawyers appealed the conviction on grounds that Roof should not have represented himself in the trial – an argument that failed to convince the appeals court. ― AFP

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

Spread the news
CONTACT US : support@melodyinter.com
Previous articleSingapore issues over 240 Air Travel Passes to travellers from Hong Kong, Macau, with first arrivals due Aug 26
Next articleJKJAV: 42.4pc of Malaysia’s population fully vaccinated against Covid-19

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here